Drinfeld-Lau Descent over Fibered Categories

Valentina Di Proietto · Fabio Tonini · Lei Zhang

2020 · arXiv preprint0 Foruma page views

Primary:math.AGAlgebraic GeometryCross-list:math.ATAlgebraic TopologyCross-list:math.CTCategory TheoryCross-list:math.NTNumber Theory
arXiv:2012.14075v3Source snapshot · 29 Jul 2024View source

Abstract

Let X{\mathcal X} be a category fibered in groupoids over a finite field Fq\mathbb{F}_q, and let kk be an algebraically closed field containing Fq\mathbb{F}_q. Denote by φk ⁣:Xk→Xkφ_k\colon {\mathcal X}_k\to {\mathcal X}_k the arithmetic Frobenius of Xk/k{\mathcal X}_k/k and suppose that M{\mathcal M} is a stack over Fq\mathbb{F}_q (not necessarily in groupoids). Then there is a natural functor αM,X ⁣:M(X)→M(Dk(X))α_{{\mathcal M},{\mathcal X}}\colon{\mathcal M}({\mathcal X})\to{\mathcal M}({\mathbf D_k}({\mathcal X})), where M(Dk(X)){\mathcal M}({\mathbf D_k}({\mathcal X})) is the category of φkφ_k-invariant maps Xk→M{\mathcal X}_k\to {\mathcal M}. A version of Drinfeld's lemma states that if X{\mathcal X} is a projective scheme and M{\mathcal M} is the stack of quasi-coherent sheaves of finite presentation, then αM,Xα_{{\mathcal M},{\mathcal X}} is an equivalence. We extend this result in several directions. For proper algebraic stacks or affine gerbes X{\mathcal X}, we prove Drinfeld's lemma and deduce that αM,Xα_{{\mathcal M},{\mathcal X}} is an equivalence for very general algebraic stacks M{\mathcal M}. For arbitrary X{\mathcal X}, we show that αM,Xα_{{\mathcal M},{\mathcal X}} is an equivalence when M{\mathcal M} is the stack of immersions, the stack of quasi-compact separated étale morphisms or any quasi-separated Deligne-Mumford stack with separated diagonal.

Source details & snapshots (1)

arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Original paper remains at arXiv.

First submitted 28 Dec 2020. Metadata retrieved 27 Oct 2026. Page created 27 Oct 2026.

A discussion page is not an endorsement, formal review, or proof verification.

Discussions

0 published

No published discussions yet.

0 discussions