Harmonic Analysis and Gamma Functions on Symplectic Groups

Dihua Jiang · Zhilin Luo · Lei Zhang

2020 · arXiv preprint0 Foruma page views

Primary:math.NTNumber TheoryCross-list:math.FAFunctional AnalysisCross-list:math.OAOperator AlgebrasCross-list:math.RTRepresentation Theory
arXiv:2006.08126v2Source snapshot · 1 Sept 2021View source

Abstract

Over a pp-adic local field FF of characteristic zero, we develop a new type of harmonic analysis on an extended symplectic group G=Gm×Sp2nG={\mathbb G}_m\times{\mathrm Sp}_{2n}. It is associated to the Langlands γγ-functions attached to any irreducible admissible representations χ⊗πχ\otimesπ of G(F)G(F) and the standard representation ρρ of the dual group G∨(C)G^\vee({\mathbb C}), and confirms a series of the conjectures in the local theory of the Braverman-Kazhdan proposal for the case under consideration. Meanwhile, we develop a new type of harmonic analysis on GL1(F){\rm GL}_1(F), which is associated to a γγ-function βψ(χs)β_ψ(χ_s) (a product of n+1n+1 certain abelian γγ-functions). Our work on GL1(F){\rm GL}_1(F) plays an indispensable role in the development of our work on G(F)G(F). These two types of harmonic analyses both specialize to the well-known local theory developed in Tate's thesis when n=0n=0. The approach is to use the compactification of Sp2n{\rm Sp}_{2n} in the Grassmannian variety of Sp4n{\rm Sp}_{4n}, with which we are able to utilize the well developed local theory of Piatetski-Shapiro and Rallis and many other works) on the doubling local zeta integrals for the standard LL-functions of Sp2n{\rm Sp}_{2n}. The method can be viewed as an extension of the work of Godement-Jacquet for the standard LL-function of GLn{\rm GL}_n and is expected to work for all classical groups. We will consider the archimedean local theory and the global theory in our future work.

Source details & snapshots (1)

arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Original paper remains at arXiv.

First submitted 15 Jun 2020. Metadata retrieved 27 Oct 2026. Page created 27 Oct 2026.

A discussion page is not an endorsement, formal review, or proof verification.

Discussions

0 published

No published discussions yet.

0 discussions